Portal frames with built-up cold-formed cross-sections hold significant potential; however, there is a notable gap in the analysis of cross-section types and connections. In this study, an optimization algorithm was developed for the closed cross-sections of portal frame members. An optimization algorithm was tested against optimized open cold-formed cross-sections. The results indicated a portal frame volume up to 38% lower where members were assembled of optimal closed cross-sections when compared to frames with optimal open cross-sections. Parametric analysis was carried out, where two types of cross-sections were examined: Type A, with four web stiffeners bent inwards, and Type B, with four web stiffeners bent outwards. The optimization was conducted using a Genetic Algorithm in MATLAB R2022b. Portal frames with optimal Type B cross-sections had a volume that was up to 22% lower when compared to frames with optimal Type A cross-sections. Significant differences were noted between the optimal beam and column cross-sections, with the optimal column cross-section thickness being on average 74% greater, but the optimal beam cross-section height being on average 81% greater than those of the respective counterparts. In this article, a practical assembly solution for the connection of the frame members was proposed for the optimized novel closed cross-section types in portal frames. However, the strength and stiffness of these connections were not analyzed in this research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stulpinas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: