For some positive integer m, a real polynomial P(x)=∑ₖ₌₀ᵐaₖxᵏ with aₖ 0 is called log-concave (resp. ultra log-concave) if aₖ² aₖ₋₁aₖ₊₁ (resp. aₖ² (1+1/k)(1+1/m-k)· aₖ₋₁aₖ₊₁) for all 1 k m-1. If $P(x)$ has only real roots, then it is called real-rooted. It is well-known that the conditions of log-concavity, ultra log-concavity and real-rootedness are ever-stronger. For a graph G, a dependent set is a set of vertices which is not independent, i.e., the set of vertices whose induced subgraph contains at least one edge. The dependence polynomial of G is defined as D(G, x):=∑k 0dₖ(G)xᵏ, where dₖ(G) is the number of dependent sets of size k in G. Horrocks proved that $D(G, x)$ is log-concave for every graph G [J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B, 84 (2002) 180--185]. In the present paper, we prove that, for a graph G, $D(G, x)$ is ultra log-concave if G is (K₂∪ 2K₁)-free or contains an independent set of size $|V(G)|-2$, and give the characterization of graphs whose dependence polynomials are real-rooted. Finally, we focus more attention to the problems of log-concavity about independence systems and pose several conjectures closely related the famous Mason's Conjecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: