To meet the increasing demand for customized software, highly configurable systems become essential in practice. Such systems offer many options to configure, and ensuring the reliability of these systems is critical. A widely-used evaluation metric for testing these systems is \(t\) -wise coverage, where \(t\) represents testing strength, and its value typically ranges from 2 to 6. It is crucial to design effective and efficient methods for generating test suites that achieve high \(t\) -wise coverage. However, current state-of-the-art methods need to generate large test suites for achieving high \(t\) -wise coverage. In this work, we propose a novel method called LS-Sampling-Plus that can efficiently generate test suites with high \(t\) -wise coverage for \(2≤ t≤ 6\) while being smaller in size compared to existing state-of-the-art methods. LS-Sampling-Plus incorporates many core algorithmic techniques, including two novel scoring functions, a dynamic mechanism for updating sampling probabilities, and a validity-guaranteed systematic search method. Our experiments on various practical benchmarks show that LS-Sampling-Plus can achieve higher \(t\) -wise coverage than current state-of-the-art methods, through building a test suite of the same size. Moreover, our evaluations indicate the effectiveness of all core algorithmic techniques of LS-Sampling-Plus . Further, LS-Sampling-Plus exhibits better scalability and fault detection capability than existing state-of-the-art methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: