PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 16, 2024Processes0 citationsOpen Access

Neotropical Biodiversity as Microbial Frontline for Obtaining Bioactive Compounds with Potential Insecticidal Action

View Full Paper
MSMaicon Sérgio Nascimento dos SantosUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaLOLissara Polano OdyHospital Universitário de Santa MariaBKBruno Douglas KerberUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The occurrence of insect pests in crops directly affects the yield of plants and grains. This scenario led to the mass investigation of chemical products that overcome these adversities and provide control potential. Nonetheless, over the years, this strategy resulted in high production costs, generation of waste harmful to the environment, and resistance of target insects. The adoption of alternative practices, such as the formulation and production of products of microbial origin, emerges as an encouraging tool compared to control alternatives, indicating a sustainability bias, and allowing a reduction in the risks of human and animal contamination. The purpose of this study was to perform bioprospecting for microbial agents with potential insecticidal effects. The isolated microorganisms were submitted to submerged fermentation, at 28 °C and 120 rpm, for seven days. The fermented broth was filtered using a vacuum pump and centrifuged at 3200× g and 10 °C for 10 min. Initially, 163 microbial agents were collected. Subsequently, a pre-selection of the 50 most promising bioagents was conducted, based on the mortality rates (%) of the applied isolates to target pests. Furthermore, a global mathematical modeling design was created, indicating the best potential microorganisms. Moreover, to stipulate the difference between treatments, dilutions of the fermented broths of each microorganism were conducted (n × 10−5–n × 10−8). Mortality was maximum (100%) for Helicoverpa zea and Euschistus heros. Other encouraging results were indicated in the control of Anticarsia gemmatalis and Chrysodeixis includens (up to 87.5%) and Elasmopalpus lignosellus (up to approximately 83.5%). Fungal isolates were identified as Talaromyces piceae. Among the bacteria, based on sequencing of the 16S ribosomal gene, the isolates were identified as Lysinibacillus fusiformis, Paenibacillus ottowii, and Clostridium sphenoides. The results obtained are relevant to the scientific community and, especially, are interesting for companies that are operating in this field in the agricultural sector.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Santos et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5bfb4b6db643587557f73https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081722
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Entomopathogens and their role in insect pest management2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Exploring Actinobacteria for new insecticides and their delivery in crop protection2026
  3. 3Eco-friendly management of Helicoverpa armigera using entomopathogenic fungi: a sustainable approach2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Crops biological protection: Phytopathogens growth inhibition by the entomopathogens2024
  5. 5A review on the Utilization of Entomopathogenic Microorganisms for the Biological Suppression of Soil-Dwelling Insect Pests: Advances, Constraints, and Future Perspectives2025