Retrospective analysis identifies predictive factors for in-hospital death among patients, using machine learning techniques to improve care.
Purpose To describe the pre- and post-admission characteristics of hospitalized patients in a tertiary care hospital and to adjust machine learning models capable of predicting and identifying the factors that are associated with and have a greater prognostic value for in-hospital death. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study based on data from patients who were discharged from a Mexican tertiary care hospital during its first 10 years of operation (2007–2016). Preadmission characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Comparison tests (Mann–Whitney U ) and association tests (chi-square) were applied according to the absence or presence of in-hospital death. Multivariate models (logistic regression, random forest and XGBoost) were fitted. Their ROC curves were compared using the DeLong test, and performance metrics were evaluated. Results In total, 55,253 hospital discharges were considered, only 45,011 (0–101 years) had complete data, and the rate of in-hospital death was 4.17%. In total, 70% of the data were used for training and 30% for testing. Two-to-two comparisons between areas under the curve (AUCs) revealed that XGBoost (AUC = 0.9162) outperformed logistic regression (AUC = 0.9036) and random forest (AUC = 0.8978) ( p -value < 0.001 in both cases). XGBoost had a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 81.3% and balanced efficiency of 84.2%. The most relevant predictive factors were medical service that performed the admission, number of conditions, origin of the outpatient consultation of the hospital, and the main condition diagnosed at admission according to the ICD-10, age, month of admission, and day of the week of admission. Conclusions Owing to its ability to capture complex patterns, the XGBoost model makes it possible to identify patients with a relatively high risk of in-hospital death using the data available at hospital admission. This constitutes a support tool for decision-making, helping to determine which patients require closer monitoring and follow-up during their hospital stay to improve the quality of medical care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodea-Montero et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: