Mendelian randomization reveals how dietary habits impact primary biliary cholangitis risk, suggesting further research on key factors.
The potential relationship between dietary intake and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remains uncertain. This study employed a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the causal link between dietary habits and PBC development, while also assessing potential mediating roles of PBC risk factors. We performed a 2-sample MR analysis using publicly accessible genome-wide association study data. Various MR methods including inverse-variance weighted, MR-Egger, weighted median, and others were utilized. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure robustness of the findings. Following multiple testing adjustment, 2 dietary factors showed significant causal relationships with PBC. Cereal consumption was inversely associated with PBC risk (OR = 0.006, 95% CI: 0–0.089, P = .000198, Bonferroni-adjusted P = .007), whereas nonoily fish intake was positively associated (OR = 578.684, 95% CI: 24.173–13853.312, P = 8.64 × 10 −05 ; Bonferroni-adjusted P = .003). Several other associations were nominally significant (unadjusted P < .05), including weekly beer and cider intake (Neale Lab: OR = 0.038, 95% CI: 0.002–0.597, P = .020; MRC-IEU: OR = 0.059, 95% CI: 0.006–0.549, P = .013), bread intake (OR = 61.404, 95% CI: 1.558–2419.859, P = .028), salad/raw vegetable intake (OR = 0.012, 95% CI: 0–0.714, P = .034), and tea intake (OR = 0.169, 95% CI: 0.037–0.767, P = .021). Notably, the effect estimates for bread and nonoily fish intake were highly imprecise, as indicated by extremely wide confidence intervals. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the primary inverse-variance weighted estimates. No evidence of causal effects was found for the other dietary exposures examined. This MR study provides genetic evidence that a predisposition toward higher cereal intake may lower the risk of PBC, while a genetic tendency for nonoily fish consumption may markedly increase risk. The nominal associations observed for beer/cider, bread, salad/raw vegetables, and tea merit further investigation in larger cohorts. The implausible effect sizes for certain exposures call for cautious interpretation and additional validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: