Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper details the development of nonbinary quantum codes and their reinforcement learning decoders, suggesting new pathways for efficient error correction.
Abstract We provide a corrected, consistent development of classical algebraic geometry (AG) codes and associated nonbinary quantum stabilizer codes built fromthe Hermitian curve yq+y=xq+1 over . This resolves earlier inconsistencies around the choice of m, point counts, dual indices, and field of the inner product. The curve has genus g=q(q-1)/2, q³+1 -rational points, and a unique point at infinity; setting D to be the sum of all affine -points gives length n= D=q³. For one-point divisors G=rP_∞ we give a monomial basis for L(G), the standard duality formula CL(D,rP_∞)^⊥=CL\!(D,(n+2g-2-r)P_∞), and a simple sufficient condition for Hermitian self-orthogonality: (q+1)r≤ n+2g-2 (equivalently, r≤ q²-2).Under this condition, Ashikhmin--Knill yields q-ary stabilizer codes [[n,n-2k,≥ dH^⊥]]q with k= CL(D,rP_∞) and dH^⊥≥ r-2g+2.We also retain a complete reinforcement-learning (RL) section: an RL-on-Greedy decoder that first applies a greedy pass then a Deep Q-Network to resolve residual syndromes. We include the original evaluation plot and all references, and clarify that the RL case study can be applied to any stabilizer code (including, but not limited to, those from Hermitian AG codes).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vahid Nourozi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: