PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 8, 2025Developmental Psychology2 citations

“The ball is in his court. It’s up to him”: Parental communication about meritocracy.

View Full Paper
LKLauren KinnardRMRashmita S. MistryLMLuke McGuire

Key Points

  • Parents frequently incorporate meritocratic beliefs into their communication about social class with children, emphasizing individual success.
  • The study found that while many parents endorse individualist views, some actively resist dominant narratives around materialism.
  • Data was gathered from qualitative interviews with 34 parents across the UK and US, highlighting diverse perspectives on social class.
  • The findings suggest a limited acceptance of counter narratives regarding structural aspects of social class in parent-child communication.

Abstract

Meritocracy-the belief that society rewards individual ability, motivation, and hard work-is foundational to many Western nations but the processes by which meritocratic beliefs are communicated to youth is not well understood. The present study used a master narrative (i.e., dominant cultural stories) framework to explore parents' communication of meritocratic messages. Data came from a larger qualitative study of family social class socialization; the interview protocol was designed to elicit information about parents' perspectives on how their families' current social class standing affects their family life, including how they communicate about social class with their children. The sample comprises parents from the United Kingdom (n = 21) and United States (n = 13) with at least one child between the ages of 5 and 17 (N = 34; Mage = 44.1 years; 50% women; 26% Asian; 26% Black; 9% Latinx; 38% white; 44% working class; 6% lower middle class; 38% middle class; 12% upper middle class). Results indicate that all parents incorporated aspects of meritocracy, adhering to individualist views of economic success. Many also resisted dominant narratives such as materialism. Far less frequent was endorsement of a counter narrative to meritocracy (i.e., structural dimensions of social class). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kinnard et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5c1c36950a706b22b5bedhttps://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002087
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How college students understand American meritocracy: From initial beliefs to emerging meanings.2026
  2. 2Multiple Meritocracies: A Text-Based Analysis of Personal Narratives Revealing Distinct Frames of Success2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Maintaining the Meritocracy Myth: A critical discourse analytic study of leaders’ talk about merit and gender in academia2024 · 42 citations
  4. 4It's my fault, I should try harder! The narratives of self‐made upward mobility sustain belief in meritocracy in low social mobility context2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Meritocracy Beliefs Are Positively Related to Institutional Trust Only in Societies With Many Economic Freedoms: A Multi‐Society Multi‐Level Analysis2025 · 4 citations