One-group pretest-posttest design improved conceptual understanding in pre-service physics teachers, suggesting research-based learning is effective.
This study investigates the impact of research-based learning on students’ conceptual understanding of thermal conduction. The research employed a one-group pretest-posttest design involving 20 pre-service physics teachers enrolled in a thermodynamics course. The research instrument used was a conceptual understanding test administered before and after implementing research-based learning. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test indicated that both pre-test and post-test data were normally distributed (p > 0.05). A paired samples t-test revealed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores (Sig. (2-tailed) = 0.000 < 0.05), suggesting that research-based learning effectively enhanced students’ conceptual understanding. Furthermore, the N-Gain analysis resulted in a score of 0.71, categorized as high, indicating a substantial improvement in students’ conceptual mastery. These findings suggest that research-based learning is an effective instructional approach in teaching thermal conduction, fostering deeper conceptual comprehension among students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: