Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Deploying deep learning models for quantitative susceptibility mapping is driven by optimizing hyper-parameters and using suitable architectures. We investigated the impact of activation functions on network model training. ELU-, leaky ReLU- and ReLU-models with 16 and 32 initial channels were tested for solving dipole inversion on synthetic susceptibility data. All models showed convergence after completing 100 training epochs. However, the 16-channel-ELU-model achieved low losses after only 20 training epochs and showed similar reconstruction performance to the 32-channel-ELU-model. Using the ELU activation allows the use of smaller network models resulting in fewer memory requirements and less training time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graf et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: