Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vivo MR g-ratio mapping relies on a calibrated method that relates myelin and axon MR markers to volume fractions. To estimate the calibration parameter, fixed ex vivo tissue measured with MRI and histology is used. The so-determined calibration parameter is then applied in vivo, neglecting the difference in the MR markers due to fixation. Here, we proposed a new calibration method accounting for this difference. The new calibration reduced the variability across MR g-ratios based on different myelin and axon markers, indicating that it can improve the accuracy of MR g-ratios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oeschger et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: