Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While media effects on individuals have been extensively studied, media effects on places are mainly examined by research on global media systems. We still lack a nuanced understanding of media’s ecological functions in more fine-grained geographical units. Answering such questions requires a shift in focus from individuals to ecologies/places, and accordingly, a methodological transition from traditional analyses to spatial analyses. In this chapter, I provide an example of spatial analysis in journalism research by studying whether local news ecologies influence non-institutional political engagement in the U.S. First, I explain and demonstrate the differences of three spatial autoregressive models – Spatial Lag of X, Spatial Lag of Y, and Spatial Durbin – in estimating the general relationships between ecological factors and political engagement. Then, I use geographically weighted regression to reveal how these relationships differ from place to place. Overall, news-rich places tend to see a higher volume of non-institutional political engagement, and the pattern applies to most parts of the U.S. except the Great Plains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abby Youran Qin (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: