X marks the spot: dissecting Danish SoMe debates on U.S. interest in Greenland

This article explores Danish X debates about U.S.' interests and involvement in Greenland, and compares it with our previous analysis of similar Danish parliamentary debates. Drawing on a mixed method research design using RStudio and qualitative content analysis, we analyze Danish tweets concerned with the U.S. and Greenland to uncover how users talk about American interests in Greenland. Our analysis reveals a Danish X discourse dominated by a critical stance towards U.S.' involvement in Greenland. When comparing it to our previous analysis of the Danish parliamentary debates, we observe a significant overlap in themes and issues between these two discursive arenas. However, X users tend to be more critical towards the U.S. and generally use a more direct and harsh tone, compared to the more polite and diplomatic tone we typically hear in the parliamentary debates.