This article aims to determine and analyze investor protection against insider trading practices in the Capital Market and the regulation of settlement of insider trading practices by the Financial Services Authority. This article uses normative legal research methods with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results show weaknesses in legal protection and regulations related to resolving problems related to Insider Trading practices. In terms of legal protection, it is also not based on empirical facts in the field because no regulations specifically regulate the practice of insider trading. Nothing specifically regulates the settlement of insider trading practices. Also, proving this practice is very difficult, so it cannot provide legal certainty to investors who have experienced capital market violations. There is no firm confirmation from the Financial Services Authority to deter perpetrators of Insider Trading by imposing cumulative penalties or sanctions as regulated in the Capital Markets Law. So, Insider Trading cases in the Indonesian Capital Market were never resolved through court.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurniawan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: