We describe a simple dark sector structure which, if present, has implications for the direct detection of dark matter (DM); . A dark sink transports energy density from the DM into light dark-sector states that do not appreciably contribute to the DM density. As an example, we consider a light, neutral fermion <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>ψ</a:mi></a:math> which interacts solely with DM <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>χ</c:mi></c:math> via the exchange of a heavy scalar <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</e:mi></e:math>. We illustrate the impact of a dark sink by adding one to a DM freeze-in model in which <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:mi>χ</h:mi></h:math> couples to a light dark photon <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:msup><j:mi>γ</j:mi><j:mo>′</j:mo></j:msup></j:math> which kinetically mixes with the Standard Model (SM) photon. This freeze-in model (absent the sink) is itself a benchmark for ongoing experiments. In some cases, the literature for this benchmark has contained errors; we correct the predictions and provide them as a public code. We then analyze how the dark sink modifies this benchmark, solving coupled Boltzmann equations for the dark-sector energy density and DM yield. We check the contribution of the dark sink <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mi>ψ</l:mi></l:math>’s to dark radiation; consistency with existing data limits the maximum attainable cross section. For DM with a mass between <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:mi>MeV</n:mi><n:mo>−</n:mo><n:mi mathvariant="script">O</n:mi><n:mo stretchy="false">(</n:mo><n:mn>10</n:mn><n:mtext> </n:mtext><n:mtext> </n:mtext><n:mi>GeV</n:mi><n:mo stretchy="false">)</n:mo></n:math>, adding the dark sink can increase predictions for the direct detection cross section all the way up to the current limits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhattiprolu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: