Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We extend the dust-filament-based model presented in Herv\'ias-Caimapo & Huffenberger 2022 to produce parity-violating foreground spectra by manipulating the filament orientations relative to the magnetic field. We calibrate our model to observations of the misalignment angle using cross-correlations of Planck and HI 21-cm line data, producing a fiducial model that predicts a D_EB~few μK² dust signal at 353 GHz and where ~ 56% of filaments have a positive misalignment angle. The main purpose of this model is to be used as dust with non-zero parity-violating emission in forecasting a measurement of cosmic birefringence by upcoming experiments. Here, we also use our fiducial model to assess the impact of dust in measurements of the isotropic cosmic birefringence angle β with Planck data by measuring the misalignment angle as a function of scale, as well as directly using our model's D_EB prediction as a template. In both cases, we measure β to be consistent within 0.83σ of the equivalent measurements with Planck data and its derivatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hervías-Caimapo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: