Multiple lines of evidence suggest that Retinoic Acid Related Orphan Nuclear Receptor gamma t (RORγt) is a potent therapeutic target for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, systemic blockade of RORγt easily leads to thymic lymphoma and aberrant liver function. Therefore, the development of gut-limited RORγt antagonists may lead to the development of innovative IBD therapeutics that improve safety and retain effectiveness. We discovered SPH7854, a potent and selective RORγt antagonist. The effect of SPH7854 on the differentiation of T helper 1 (Th1)/Th17/regulatory T (Treg) cells was evaluated in mouse and human primary cells. SPH7854 (2-(4-(ethylsulfonyl)phenyl)-N- (6-(2-methyl-2-(pyridin-2-yl) propanoyl)pyridin-3-yl)acetamide) dose-dependently inhibited interleukin-17A (IL-17A) secretion from mouse CD4 + T cells and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Additionally, SPH7854 strongly suppressed Th17 cell differentiation and considerably promoted Treg cell differentiation while slightly affected Th1 cell differentiation from mouse CD4 + T cells. The pharmacokinetic (PK) studies indicated that SPH7854 was restricted to the gut: the bioavailability and maximal plasma concentration of SPH7854 after oral administration (6 mg/kg) were 1.24 ± 0.33 % and 4.92 ± 11.81 nM, respectively, in rats. Strikingly, oral administration of SPH7854 (5 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg) twice daily significantly alleviated 2, 4, 6-trinitrobenzensulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis in rats. SPH7854, especially at 15 mg/kg, significantly alleviated symptoms and improved macroscopic signs and microscopic structure in rat colitis, with decreased colonic mucosal levels of IL-17A, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). These evidences indicated that blockade of RORγt activity via a gut-limited antagonist may be an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for IBD treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: