PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 10, 2024Digital Transformation and Society144 citationsOpen Access

Dimensions and barriers for digital (in)equity and digital divide: a systematic integrative review

View Full Paper
MRMohammad Mojammel Hussain RaihanSSSujoy SubrotoNCNashit Chowdhury

Key Points

  • Access to digital resources remains unequal, affecting vulnerable groups like low-income individuals and minorities.
  • The review identified four key dimensions impacting digital equity, including digital literacy and access to infrastructure.
  • Analysis involved 31 articles and 54 documents, employing various research methods like qualitative and quantitative approaches for a comprehensive view of the issue. The review underscores that understanding the intersectional characteristics is vital for addressing the digital divide effectively.

Abstract

Purpose This integrative review was conducted to provide an overview of existing research on digital (in)equity and the digital divide in developed countries. Design/methodology/approach We searched academic and grey literature to identify relevant papers. From 8464 academic articles and 183 grey literature, after two levels of screening, 31 articles and 54 documents were selected, respectively. A thematic analysis was conducted following the steps suggested by Braun and Clarke and results were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Findings The results showed that most articles and papers were either from Europe or North America. Studies used a range of research methods, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. The results demonstrated four major dimensions of the digital divide among various vulnerable groups, including digital literacy, affordability, equity-deserving group-sensitive content and availability or access to infrastructure. Among vulnerable groups, low-income people were reported in the majority of the studies followed by older adults, racial and ethnic minorities, newcomers/new immigrants and refugees, Indigenous groups, people with disabilities and women. Most reported barriers included lack of access to the internet, digital skills, language barriers and internet costs. Originality/value To the best of our knowledge, there have been limited attempts to thoroughly review the literature to better understand the emerging dimensions of digital equity and the digital divide, identifying major vulnerable populations and their unique barriers and challenges. This review demonstrated that understanding intersectional characteristics (age, gender, disability, race, ethnicity, Indigenous identity and immigration status) and their interconnections is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of digital (in)equity and divide.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raihan et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5cb6fb6db643587562541https://doi.org/10.1108/dts-04-2024-0054
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper