PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 9, 2024Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Percutaneous nucleoplasty and intradiscal electrothermal therapy in the management of lumbar discogenic pain: A retrospective comparative study

View Full Paper
YYYongjae YooJBJungil BaeHKHangaram Kim

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Percutaneous lumbar nucleoplasty (PLN) and intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) are effective treatment options for discogenic low back pain (D-LBP). We evaluated the effectiveness of PLN and IDET and the positive predictive factors associated with intradiscal procedures. We reviewed the medical records of 205 patients who underwent IDET or PLN in patients with D-LBP followed by positive provocation discography. A successful outcome was defined as ≥ 50% pain relief on the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at the 6-month follow-up visit. The relationship between the outcome of the intradiscal procedure and clinical variables was investigated using multivariate analyses. Of the 142 patients (89 with PLN and 53 with IDET), 86 (60.5%) experienced a successful outcome, which was more substantial in PLN (n = 61, 68.5%) than in IDET (n = 25, 47.2%; P = .010). The high-grade Modified Dallas Discogram Scale in provocation discography and a procedure at the L3/L4 spinal level were independent positive predictors of successful outcomes (P = .023 and .010, respectively). Coexisting psychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety, were negative predictors of successful treatment (P = .007). No serious complications related to the intradiscal procedures were reported during the 6-month follow-up period. PLN and IDET might be effective for managing low back pain (LBP) from internal disc disruption (IDD). The high-grade Modified Dallas Discogram, a procedure at the L3/4 spinal level, and the absence of neuropsychiatric disorders could be positive factors for the successful outcome of the intradiscal procedure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yoo et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5ceabb6db643587564880https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000039230
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cauda equina syndrome from intradiscal electrothermal therapy2000 · 61 citations
  2. 2NSAIDs for Chronic Low Back Pain2017 · 64 citations
  3. 3Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2018 · 130 citations
  4. 4Low Back Pain2001 · 1,678 citations
  5. 5Systematic Review of Lumbar Provocation Discography in Asymptomatic Subjects with a Meta-analysis of False-positive Rates2008 · 232 citations