PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 8, 2024African Journal of Urology1 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation index among infertile individuals: a comprehensive analysis of the associated factors—a cross-sectional study

View Full Paper
RVReza ValipourBNBehzad NarouieSJSajedeh Jadidi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background Ensuring the integrity of sperm DNA is of paramount importance for the production of healthy offspring. The process of sperm formation involves intricate molecular adjustments that condense and safeguard its genetic material. However, the risk posed by sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) can impede natural and assisted fertility and may arise from various testicular and post-testicular factors. While there are recommendations against routine SDF testing, recent research has sparked debate by demonstrating the positive impact of such testing on fertility outcomes. Objective To identify the factors associated with SDF among infertile individuals. Methods and materials The medical records of infertile men referred to our hospital were comprehensively reviewed and included in the study as they met the inclusion criteria. Patients dissatisfied with participation in the study or those with incomplete medical records were excluded. The association of SDF, sperm analysis, and demographic characteristics were evaluated for further investigation. Results The average age of participants was 36.1 ± 8.1 years. The average semen volume was 2.5 ± 0.3 cc with a semen pH of 7.4 ± 0.2. The average sperm count was 10.9 ± 0.7 million, sperm motility was 36.9 ± 2.4%, and normal sperm morphology was 41.7 ± 2.7%. SDF levels below 15% were seen in 27.9%, between 15 and 30% in 32.4%, and above 30% in 39.7% of patients. Significant associations were found between the SDF and various factors in sperm analysis, including sperm count ( P < 0.001), semen volume ( P < 0.001), semen pH ( P < 0.001), sperm motility ( P < 0.001), normal sperm morphology ( P < 0.001), and age ( P < 0.001). Moreover, alcohol consumption ( P = 0.04), smoking ( P = 0.01), and the presence of varicocele ( P = 0.03) were significantly associated with. Conclusion This study emphasizes the significance of SDF among individuals experiencing infertility and investigates its correlation with various sperm test parameters. It also sheds light on the vital roles played by factors such as age, smoking, alcohol consumption, and the presence of varicocele, which are highly likely to cause variations in SDF levels. The results of our research will add to the existing pool of knowledge on infertility and potentially have implications for clinical practice and the care of patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Valipour et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5d11bb6db643587567644https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00439-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Maternal control of genomic imprint maintenance2013 · 38 citations
  2. 2Assessment of the Impact Induced by Different Incubation Time, Storage Time, Storage Medium and Thawing Methods on Sperm DNA Fragmentation Assay2022 · 4 citations
  3. 3Genetics of male infertility2018 · 953 citations
  4. 4Protective effect of saponin on sperm DNA fragmentation of mice treated with cyclophosphamide2021 · 20 citations
  5. 5Are WHO Recommendations to Perform 2 Consecutive Semen Analyses for Reliable Diagnosis of Male Infertility Still Valid?2018 · 36 citations