In this article on page number 12 of 13 of pdf copy in the "6 Results and Discussion" section in the first four lines there is a typographical mistake.The cross-sectional values were written by mistake for monitor reactions.The statement in the manuscript is as below:The measured cross sections of 107 Ag(n,2n) 106m Ag reaction at the neutron energies of 10.50 ± 0.68, 13.52 ± 0.67, 16.86 ± 0.55 and 19.89 ± 0.59 MeV are 94.366 ± 0.996, 125.456 ± 0.525, 100.793 ± 0.772 and 44.029 ± 1.308 (mb), respectively.So the full correct sentence should have been:The measured cross sections of 107 Ag(n,2n) 106m Ag reaction at the neutron energies of 10.50 ± 0.68, 13.52 ± 0.67, 16.86 ± 0.55 and 19.89 ± 0.59 MeV are 100.01 ± 12, 441.432 ± 44, 657.608 ± 68 and 708.752 ± 74 (mb), respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chauhan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: