Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) in a group of Chinese adolescents. Methods A total of 1138 adolescents (15.24 ± 1.17 years old) were tested with the Chinese version of CPV-Q, Parent-Adolescent Conflict Scale, and Adolescent Aggressive Behavior Scale of which 201 adolescents were retested 1 month later. The Chinese version of CPV-Q contains psychological, physical, financial, and control/domain factors with 14 items. Results The four-factor model has good main fit indicators (father: χ 2 /df = 3.28, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06; mother: χ 2 /df = 3.30, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06); the scale has good criterion-related validity. The Cronbach’s α coefficients of the Chinese version of CPV-Q were 0.89 (father) and 0.88 (mother), and the Cronbach’s α coefficients of the four subscales were 0.81 ~ 0.84 (father) and 0.76 ~ 0.85 (mother). The test–retest reliability of the Chinese version of CPV-Q was 0.85 (father) and 0.83 (mother), and the test–retest reliability of the four subscales was 0.80 ~ 0.83 (father) and 0.75 ~ 0.84 (mother). Conclusion Therefore, the CPV-Q has good reliability and validity for Chinese adolescents and can be used as an effective tool to evaluate Chinese adolescents’ violence toward their parents.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Weishi Xie
Hefei Normal University
M. Wang
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Linya Wang
Hefei Normal University
Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica
Hefei Normal University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xie et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5d467b6db643587569f14 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00314-1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: