In the previous work, LCgau-core-BOP, which includes the short-range interelectronic Gaussian attenuating Hartree–Fock (HF) exchange to the long-range HF exchange, showed high accuracy core-excitation energies from 1s orbitals of the second-row atoms (1s → π*, 1s → σ*, 1s → n*, and 1s → Rydberg), but underestimates the core-excitation energies from 1s orbitals of the third-row atoms. To improve this, we added one more Gaussian attenuating HF exchange to LCgau-core-BOP. We named it LC2gau-core-BOP, which achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.6 and 0.3 eV for core excitation energies of the second- and third-row atoms of the tested small molecules, respectively. We found that the inclusion of the short-range interelectronic HF exchange at a distance ranging from 0.2 to 0.6 a.u. contributes to the increase of performances on 1s orbital energy calculations of the second-row atoms, while the inclusion of more short-range interelectronic HF exchange at a distance ranging from 0 to 0.2 a.u. does to the increase of performance on 1s orbital energy calculations of the third-row atoms. It is notable that all of these improvements were accomplished using flexible Gaussian attenuating HF exchange inclusion. LC2gau-core-BOP shows deviations of less than 0.8 eV from experimental values for all of the core-excitation energies of the tested medium-size molecules consisting of thymine, oxazole, glycine, and dibenzothiophene sulfone. Moreover, by optimizing one parameter of the OP correlation functional, LC2gau-core-BOP provides atomization energies over the G3 test set with an accuracy comparable to that of B3LYP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahn et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: