Consider three closed linear subspaces C₁, C₂, C 1 , C 2 , and C₃ C 3 of a Hilbert space H and the orthogonal projections P₁, P₂ P 1 , P 2 and P₃ P 3 onto them. Halperin showed that a point in C₁∩ C₂ ∩ C₃ C 1 ∩ C 2 ∩ C 3 can be found by iteratively projecting any point x₀ ∈ H x 0 ∈ H onto all the sets in a periodic fashion. The limit point is then the projection of x₀ x 0 onto C₁∩ C₂ ∩ C₃ C 1 ∩ C 2 ∩ C 3 . Nevertheless, a non-periodic projection order may lead to a non-convergent projection series, as shown by Kopecká, Müller, and Paszkiewicz. This raises the question how many projection orders in \1,2,3 { 1 , 2 , 3 } N are “well behaved” in the sense that they lead to a convergent projection series. Melo, da Cruz Neto, and de Brito provided a necessary and sufficient condition under which the projection series converges and showed that the “well behaved” projection orders form a large subset in the sense of having full product measure. We show that also from a topological viewpoint the set of “well behaved” projection orders is a large subset: it contains a dense G_δ G δ subset with respect to the product topology. Furthermore, we analyze why the proof of the measure theoretic case cannot be directly adapted to the topological setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daylen K. Thimm (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: