Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The field of cyber risks is rapidly expanding, yet significant research remains to be conducted. Numerous taxonomy-based systems have been proposed in both the academic literature and industrial practice to classify cyber risk threats. However, the fragmentation of various approaches has resulted in a plethora of taxonomies, often incongruent with one another. In this study, we undertake a comprehensive review of these alternative taxonomies and offer a common framework for their classification based on their scope. Furthermore, we introduce desirable properties of a taxonomy, which enable comparisons of different taxonomies with the same scope. Finally, we discuss the managerial implications stemming from the utilization of each taxonomy class to support decision-making processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabitti et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: