Thin spray-on liners (TSLs) are a promising rock support method due to their ease of application and versatility. However, their effectiveness relies on experience and lacks a complete scientific understanding. To bridge some of the knowledge gaps existing in support mechanisms, this study investigated the effect of different parameters on the shearbond strength of TSLs as a surface support in underground excavations. The parameters included liner thickness, curing period, material type and surface cleanliness. A polymer based cementitious TSL was utilized while the material type included quartz and sandstone rocks and 30 MPa concrete. Liner thicknesses included 16.2 mm, 20.2 mm, 24.2 mm, 28.2 mm, and 32.2 mm while curing periods were 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days. It was observed that the TSL shear-bond strength varied with different materials. Quartz with the lowest porosity had the lowermost shear-bond strength at all liner thicknesses and curing periods. The shear-bond strength improved with liner thickness up to 24.2 mm and then decreased up to 32.2 mm due to the optimum thickness effect. It also increased with curing period. Oil reduced the shear-bond strength for all the material types at all liner thicknesses and curing periods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jjuuko et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: