We illuminate effects of surface-charge convection intrinsic to leaky-dielectric electrohydrodynamics by analyzing the symmetric steady state of a circular drop in an external field at arbitrary electric Reynolds number <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:msub><a:mi>Re</a:mi><a:mi>E</a:mi></a:msub></a:math>. In formulating the problem, we identify an exact factorization that reduces the number of dimensionless parameters from four—<b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><b:msub><b:mi>Re</b:mi><b:mi>E</b:mi></b:msub></b:math> and the conductivity, permittivity and viscosity ratios—to two: a modified electric Reynolds number <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><c:mover accent="true"><c:mi>Re</c:mi><c:mo>̃</c:mo></c:mover></c:math> and a charging parameter <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><e:mi>ϖ</e:mi></e:math>. In the case <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><f:mrow><f:mi>ϖ</f:mi><f:mo><</f:mo><f:mn>0</f:mn></f:mrow></f:math>, where charge relaxation in the drop phase is slower than in the suspending phase, and, as a consequence, the interface polarizes antiparallel to the external field, we find that above a critical <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><g:mover accent="true"><g:mi>Re</g:mi><g:mo>̃</g:mo></g:mover></g:math> value the solution exhibits a blowup singularity such that the surface-charge density diverges antisymmetrically with the <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:mrow><i:mo>−</i:mo><i:mn>1</i:mn><i:mo>/</i:mo><i:mn>3</i:mn></i:mrow></i:math> power of distance from the equator. We use local analysis to uncover the structure of that blowup singularity, wherein surface charges are convected by a locally induced flow towards the equator where they annihilate. To study the blowup regime, we devise a numerical scheme encoding that local structure where the blowup prefactor is determined by a global charging-annihilation balance. We also employ asymptotic analysis to construct a universal problem governing the blowup solutions in the regime <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><j:mrow><j:mover accent="true"><j:mi>Re</j:mi><j:mo>̃</j:mo></j:mover><j:mo>≫</j:mo><j:mn>1</j:mn></j:mrow></j:math>, far beyond the blowup threshold. In the case <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><l:mrow><l:mi>ϖ</l:mi><l:mo>></l:mo><l:mn>0</l:mn></l:mrow></l:math>, where charge relaxation is faster in the drop phase and the interface polarizes parallel to the external field, we numerically observe and asymptotically characterize the formation at large <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mover accent="true"><m:mi>Re</m:mi><m:mo>̃</m:mo></m:mover></m:math> of stagnant, perfectly conducting surface-charge caps about the drop poles. The cap size grows and the cap voltage decreases monotonically with increasing conductivity or decreasing permittivity of the drop phase relative to the suspending phase. The flow in this scenario is nonlinearly driven by electrical shear stresses at the complement of the caps. In both polarization scenarios, the flow at large <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><o:mover accent="true"><o:mi>Re</o:mi><o:mo>̃</o:mo></o:mover></o:math> scales linearly with the magnitude of the external field, contrasting the familiar quadratic scaling under weak fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: