In this study, a computer-driven, phoneme-agnostic method was explored for assessing speech disorders (SDs) in children, bypassing traditional labor-intensive phonetic transcription. Using the SpeechMark® automatic syllabic cluster (SC) analysis, which detects sequences of acoustic features that characterize well-formed syllables, 1952 American English utterances of 60 preschoolers were analyzed [16 with speech disorder present (SD-P) and 44 with speech disorder not present (SD-NP)] from two dialectal areas. A four-factor regression analysis evaluated the robustness of seven automated measures produced by SpeechMark® and their interactions. SCs significantly predicted SD status (p < 0.001). A secondary analysis using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution evaluated the number of SCs produced by the groups. Results highlighted that children with SD-P produced fewer well-formed clusters [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.8116, p ≤ 0.0137]. The interaction between speech group and age indicated that the effect of age on syllable count was more pronounced in children with SD-P (IRR = 1.0451, p = 0.0251), suggesting that even small changes in age can have a significant effect on SCs. In conclusion, speech status significantly influences the degree to which preschool children produce acoustically well-formed SCs, suggesting the potential for SCs to be speech biomarkers for SD in preschoolers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Speights et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: