Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stochastic conjugation of cetuximab to CDK inhibitor and ADC internalization in live breast cancer cells. A, Flow cytometric evaluation of surface EGFR expression (TNBC: MDA-MB-468, HCC1143, HCC1806, MDA-MB-231, HCC1937, SUM149, and CAL51; HER2+: SKBR3; ER+: MCF7, T47D; nontumorigenic epithelial cell model: MCF10A; immune cell model: human B lymphocytes RPMI8866, RPMI8226, and monocytic cell line U937; human primary melanocyte: melanocyte). B, EGFR mRNA expression from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia database showed a positive correlation with surface EGFR measured by flow cytometry in A (Spearman’s rank coefficient, r = 0.723). A high level of correlation was found between EGFR and cyclin E (r = 0.738), but not with cyclin A or CDK2. Nonsignificant P values are marked as NS. C, Top, Schematic diagram of stochastic ADC conjugation by antibody reduction with TCEP and then conjugation to SNS-032 via MC-Val–Ala-PAB. Middle, HIC analysis confirmed an average DAR of 4.4. Bottom, SEC trace indicates negligible ADC aggregation and minimal free linker–payload (less than 0.8%). D, Surface plasmon resonance analysis demonstrated similar binding affinity (KD) for cetuximab (0.73 nmol/L) and ADC (1.28 nmol/L). Isotype IgG1 and isotype ADC showed no measurable binding. E, Monitoring internalization of Fabfluor-pH-labeled cetuximab, ADC, or isotype control (10 nmol/L) by Incucyte live-cell imaging. Phase and red fluorescence time-course images were captured for 24 hours. Images of internalized antibody display in cytosolic, low pH lysosomal vesicle-associated red fluorescence in cells. Scale bar, 0.2 mm. F, Cells were seeded in Matrigel for 5 days, allowing the formation of spheroids. Fabfluor-pH-labeled antibodies or ADC (10 nmol/L) were introduced in the Matrigel and showed rapid internalization in EGFR-high MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231, whereas EGFR-low CAL51 displayed little red fluorescence signals. A low level of internalization was observed for isotype or isotype-ADC controls. Scale bar, 0.5 mm. P values determined by two-tailed unpaired t test of three independent experiments compared with isotype control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheung et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: