Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose:While speech-language pathologists (SLPs) play a pivotal role in identifying and treating social communication impairment in traumatic brain injury (TBI), there has been limited adoption of standardized assessments. SLPs report a lack of time, as well as a lack of competence in the administration of social communication assessments as primary barriers. Developing a feasible and valid screening tool is a viable solution to these barriers. The present study investigates a transcription-less rating scale as a screening tool for social communication impairment in TBI. Method:In a single-blind study, N=38 graduate clinicians listened to, and rated, six-minute conversation samples from ten speakers (5 TBI and 5 control [neurotypical]). Graduate clinician ratings were analyzed to determine if there were between-group differences in TBI and control speakers’ conversations, and whether raters had high agreement regarding speaker impairment. In addition, social communication ratings from the screener were compared to a gold standard of social communication measurement derived from transcribed analysis of the conversation samples. Results:Graduate clinicians significantly differentiated TBI from control speakers using the transcription-less rating scale and the ratings corresponded to patterns identified in the transcribed analyses. Given an exploratory “cut-off” score, raters identified speakers with TBI with 80% accuracy. Conclusions:These preliminary findings indicate that a brief, transcription-less rating scale holds promise to screen for social communication impairment in TBI to determine whether further assessment is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birch et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: