The objective of this research was to characterize the semantic structures used by mathematics teachers and researchers in training, by proposing Additive Verbal Statement Problems (PAEV) for this purpose, a workshop was designed and implemented where the 20 categories of semantic structures of change were addressed, combination, comparison and equalization.Subsequently, 77 PAEV proposed by the participants were analyzed, considering their structure and semantic dependency.The results showed that the participants did not present difficulties when proposing PAEV with respect to the combination and comparison structures, the opposite happening with respect to the change and equalization structures.On the other hand, with the analysis of semantic dependency, it was observed that a statement presents coherence, with the argument, the agent and the verb being present, so it is not necessary for the seven terms to appear.In general, it is important that both teachers and researchers in training know and manage to propose PAEV according to each category and semantic dependency, in addition to being challenging for students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fino-Miranda et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: