Recognizing that enteric tuft cells can signal the presence of nematode parasites, we investigated whether tuft cells are required for the expulsion of the cestode, Hymenolepis diminuta , from the non-permissive mouse host, and in concomitant anti-helminthic responses. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice infected with H . diminuta expelled the worms by 11 days post-infection (dpi) and displayed DCLK1 + (doublecortin-like kinase 1) tuft cell hyperplasia in the small intestine (not the colon) at 11 dpi. This tuft cell hyperplasia was dependent on IL-4R α signalling and adaptive immunity, but not the microbiota. Expulsion of H . diminuta was slowed until at least 14 dpi, but not negated, in tuft cell-deficient Pou2f3 -/- mice and was accompanied by delayed goblet cell hyperplasia and slowed small bowel transit. Worm antigen and mitogen evoked production of IL-4 and IL-10 by splenocytes from wild-type and Pou2f3 -/- mice was not appreciably different, suggesting similar systemic immune reactivity to infection with H . diminuta . Wild-type and Pou2f3 -/- mice infected with H . diminuta displayed partial protection against subsequent infection with the nematode Heligmosomoides bakeri . We speculate that, with respect to H . diminuta , enteric tuft cells are important for local immune events driving the rapidity of H . diminuta expulsion but are not critical in initiating or sustaining systemic Th2 responses that provide concomitant immunity against secondary infection with H . bakeri .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajeev et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: