Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of breathing at FIO₂ < 0.21 on disease outcomes have been reported in previous preclinical and clinical studies. However, the safety and intra-hospital feasibility of breathing hypoxic gas for 5 d have not been established. In this study, we examined the physiologic effects of breathing a gas mixture with FIO₂ as low as 0.11 in 5 healthy volunteers. METHODS: All 5 subjects completed the study, spending 5 consecutive days in a hypoxic tent, where the ambient oxygen level was lowered in a stepwise manner over 5 d, from FIO₂ of 0.16 on the first day to FIO₂ of 0.11 on the fifth day of the study. All the subjects returned to an environment at room air on the sixth day. The subjects9 SpO₂, heart rate, and breathing frequency were continuously recorded, along with daily blood sampling, neurologic evaluations, transthoracic echocardiography, and mental status assessments. RESULTS: Breathing hypoxia concentration dependently caused profound physiologic changes, including decreased SpO₂ and increased heart rate. At FIO₂ of 0.14, the mean SpO₂ was 92%; at FIO₂ of 0.13, the mean SpO₂ was 93%; at FIO₂ of 0.12, the mean SpO₂ was 88%; at FIO₂ of 0.11, the mean SpO₂ was 85%; and, finally, at an FIO₂ of 0.21, the mean SpO₂ was 98%. These changes were accompanied by increased erythropoietin levels and reticulocyte counts in blood. All 5 subjects concluded the study with no adverse events. No subjects exhibited signs of mental status changes or pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current physiologic study suggests that, within a hospital setting, delivering FIO₂ as low as 0.11 is feasible and safe in healthy subjects, and provides the foundation for future studies in which therapeutic effects of hypoxia breathing are tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berra et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: