Green Innovation Management (GIM) has become increasingly prominent over recent years, reflecting a global advancement in responding to environmental challenges through ecofriendly practices.This research illuminates the evolving landscape of GIM research, describing its conceptual emergency and academic significance by undertaking an exhaustive bibliometric analysis, where the growth of GIM literature is valuated, scrutinizing patterns in publications, citations, and collaborations.The study identifies the most relevant institutions, articles, countries, and keywords utilized in research about GIM.The findings reveal a clear alignment between innovation and environmental awareness, highlighting solutions prioritizing environmental impact without compromising developmental objectives as it relates to the authors and institutional collaborations networks involved in studying GIM.The research identifies significant stakeholders and collaborative networks while highlighting regional disparities in how policy frameworks affect GIM research output.The report highlights unexplored regions and suggests further research for academics of sustainable development and green innovation.The paper critically examines the complexity and trend of GIM globally, while providing a strong urge for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners to reinforce their commitment to sustainable innovation and strategies for future environmental action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anuphat Thirakulwanich (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: