Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The rapid adoption of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT by students has the potential to disrupt the higher education sector, with concerns being raised by academics about potential threats to academic integrity. This paper contributes to the pressing discussion about responses to AI tools by examining students' perceptions and the use of generative AI to assist them with assessments. Based on a survey among 337 Australian university students, this study found that more than a third of students have used a chatbot for assistance with an assessment, and do not necessarily perceive this as a breach of academic integrity. The study further investigated to what extent different psychosocial factors such as learning motivations, distress or resilience are associated with students' use of AI chatbots in order to ascertain environmental conditions or risk factors driving their use. Findings suggest that the higher education sector faces the challenge of not only defining clear policies and guidelines about ethical and academically honest ways to use and integrate generative AI tools into university education and assessments, but also to rethink the design of assessment pieces.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gruenhagen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5ea28b6db64358757e65e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273
Jan Henrik Gruenhagen
University of Technology Sydney
Peter M. Sinclair
University of Technology Sydney
Julie‐Anne Carroll
Queensland University of Technology
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Queensland University of Technology
University of Technology Sydney
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: