PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 29, 2024Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences20 citationsOpen Access

Slow convergence: Career impediments to interdisciplinary biomedical research

View Full Paper
EBEnrico BerkesUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyMMMonica MarionIndiana University BloomingtonSMStaša MilojevićIndiana University Bloomington

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Despite the long-standing calls for increased levels of interdisciplinary research as a way to address society’s grand challenges, most science is still disciplinary. To understand the slow rate of convergence to more interdisciplinary research, we examine 154,021 researchers who received a PhD in a biomedical field between 1970 and 2013, measuring the interdisciplinarity of their articles using the disciplinary composition of references. We provide a range of evidence that interdisciplinary research is impactful, but that those who conduct it face early career impediments. The researchers who are initially the most interdisciplinary tend to stop publishing earlier in their careers—it takes about 8 y for half of the researchers in the top percentile in terms of initial interdisciplinarity to stop publishing, compared to more than 20 y for moderately interdisciplinary researchers (10th to 75th percentiles). Moreover, perhaps in response to career challenges, initially interdisciplinary researchers on average decrease their interdisciplinarity over time. These forces reduce the stock of interdisciplinary researchers who can train future cohorts. Indeed, new graduates tend to be less interdisciplinary than the stock of active researchers. We show that interdisciplinarity does increase over time despite these dampening forces because initially disciplinary researchers become more interdisciplinary as their careers progress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berkes et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5ea28b6db64358757e831https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402646121
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Research in Medicine: Journal ranking vs. Interdisciplinarity2025
  2. 2Navigating interdisciplinary research: Historical progression and contemporary challenges2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Why and how academics become interdisciplinary researchers early in their careers2024 · 18 citations
  4. 4Is Interdisciplinary Research More Conducive to Knowledge Innovation? Evidence From Swiss National Science Foundation Projects2026 · 3 citations
  5. 5Interdisciplinarity in Focus: Exploring Ideas,Challenges, and Prospects2025