A collective choice (or opinion) supported by a majority of individuals is challenged recurrently by a new one in a society. We consider a long-run evolution of collective choice under majority rules by stochastic evolutionary game theory. The Condorcet winner is uniquely a long-run equilibrium for all (super-)majority rules. When the Condorcet winner does not exist, the long-run equilibria under all majority rules belong to the top cycle set. In a multidimensional choice problem where the top cycle set tends to become the whole policy space, a long-run equilibrium belongs to the min–max policy set if the core is non-empty. We show that stochastic evolutionary game theory can mitigate the indeterminacy problem in social choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okada et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: