Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACT Objective Currently, the most commonly used methods for linkage analysis of pre‐implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT‐M) are next generation sequencing (NGS) and SNP array. We aim to investigate whether the application efficacy of Asian screening array (ASA) in PGT‐M preclinical workup for the Chinese population is superior to NGS based single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis by reviewing 294 couples from a single center over the past 4 years and compared the detection results between NGS‐based SNP panels and ASA. Using the numbers of informative SNPs upstream and downstream flanking of variants, we assessed the detection efficiency of both methods in monogenic diseases, chromosomal microdeletion syndrome and males with de novo variants, among other scenarios. Results Results indicate that ASA offers a greater number of informative SNPs compared with NGS‐based SNP panels. Additionally, data analysis for ASA is generally more straightforward and may require less computational resources. While ASA can address most PGT‐M challenges, we have also identified certain genes in previous tests that are not suitable for PGT‐M using ASA. Conclusion The application of ASA in PGT‐M preclinical workup for Chinese populations has good practical value as it can perform linkage analysis for most genetic variants. However, for certain variants, NGS or other testing methods, such as mutated allele revealed by sequencing with aneuploidy and linkage analysis (MARSALA), may still be necessary for completion.
Ren et al. (Sat,) studied this question.