Objective: To compare between conservative management and appendectomy for acute appendicitis during pregnancy by trimester. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: 632 acute-care hospitals in Japan. Population: Pregnant women diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Methods: We conducted a large nationwide study using a national inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2022. Comparisons were conducted using multivariable analysis with generalized estimating equations. Main Outcome Measures: Preterm labor, preterm delivery, or abortion, antepartum hemorrhage, duration of hospitalization, and duration of antibiotic use. Results: 3,158 individuals were eligible. Proportions of conservative management versus appendectomy by trimester were 507 (49.1%) vs. 525 (50.9%) in the first, 690 (44.6%) vs. 856 (55.4%) in the second, and 337 (58.1%) vs. 243 (41.9%) in the third. In the second trimester, appendectomy had a higher rate of preterm delivery, preterm labor, or abortion (OR 2.91; 95% CI 1.62–5.25). Antepartum hemorrhage occurred more frequently for appendectomy in the first (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.31–3.43) and third (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.79–3.31) trimesters. Appendectomy had longer duration of hospitalization in the second (2.15 days; 95% CI 1.14–3.17 days) and third (3.97 days; 95% CI 2.22–5.71 days) trimesters. Antibiotic use duration was shorter for appendectomy in the first (−1.20 days; 95% CI −1.51 to −0.90 days) and second (−0.61 days; 95% CI −0.90 to −0.32 days) trimesters. Conclusions: Clinical outcomes of acute appendicitis during pregnancy vary by trimester. Considering the appendectomy risks, conservative management may be viable depending on the clinical context and trimester.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: