This paper makes three contributions. First, it presents a generalizable, novel framework dubbed toxicity rabbit hole that iteratively elicits toxic content from a wide suite of large language models. Spanning a set of 1,266 identity groups, we first conduct a bias audit of PaLM 2 guardrails presenting key insights. Next, we report generalizability across several other models. Through the elicited toxic content, we present a broad analysis with a key emphasis on racism, antisemitism, misogyny, Islamophobia, homophobia, and transphobia. We release a massive dataset of machine-generated toxic content with a view toward safety for all. Finally, driven by concrete examples, we discuss potential ramifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dutta et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: