Supplementary material to "Concurrent modes of climate variability linked to spatially compounding wind and precipitation extremes in the Northern Hemisphere"

S1 Additional figuresFigure S1.Model evaluation (CESM vs ERA5).ERA5 and CESM mean frequencies (count) of wintertime compound wind and precipitation (CWP) extremes computed at each grid cell without any constraints on modes of variability phases.For model evaluation only, CWP extreme frequencies from the CESM model have been regridded via a nearest-neighbour approach to ERA5 grid.Results are presented by defining CWP extremes when both daily wind and precipitation values exceed their 95th percentiles simultaneously for the period 1959-2019.Numbers in the headers indicate the empirical return period (T=1 year because there are no constraints on modes here in contrast to images in the main text).Stippling indicates that the range of the average CWP extreme frequencies of the CESM ensemble does not cover the value of ERA5.