Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rationale: Effective interventions to prevent burnout among intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians are urgently needed. Death Cafés, group discussions about death, build a sense of community and create a space for reflection on distressing events. Objective: To assess whether participation in regular Death Cafés can prevent burnout in ICU clinicians (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, therapists). Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2020-December 2022 in ten ICUs in Louisiana. Subjects were randomized to attend four psychotherapist-facilitated, virtual Death Cafés or to a control arm. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was burnout defined by the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) at 6 months. Depression and anxiety scores were measured as well as qualitative data on stressors, coping, and Death Café experience. Among 340 clinicians screened and consented (171 physicians; 169 non-physicians), 251 participated (mean age 31.06.8 years, 63% female, 72% white, 37% nurses, 27% residents, 25% interns, 11% other). Burnout prevalence was 19% at baseline. Of 136 participants who completed 6-month follow-up, no significant differences were found between intervention and control for the primary outcome (18% versus 25%, unadjusted OR 0.64 [95% CI 0.26-1.57], p=0.33). There were no differences in anxiety or depression. Notably, the study was limited by an inability to achieve target enrollment and high attrition rate (46%). Conclusions: Virtual Death Cafés were unable to reduce burnout, although the study was underpowered to detect differences between groups. Clinical trial registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04347811)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bateman et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: