Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interactions between glycan-binding proteins (GBPs) and glycosphingolipids (GSLs) present in cell membranes are implicated in a wide range of biological processes. However, studying GSL binding is hindered by the paucity of purified GSLs and the weak affinities typical of monovalent GBP–GSL interactions. Native mass spectrometry (nMS) performed using soluble model membranes is a promising approach for the discovery of GBP ligands, but the detection of weak interactions remains challenging. The present work introduces MEmbrane ANchor-assisted nMS (MEAN-nMS) for the detection of low-affinity GBP–GSL complexes. The assay utilizes a membrane anchor, produced by covalent cross-linking of the GBP and a lipid in the membrane, to localize the GBP on the surface and promote GSL binding. Ligands are identified by nMS detection of intact GBP–GSL complexes (MEAN-nMS) or using a catch-and-release (CaR) strategy, wherein GSLs are released from GBP–GSL complexes upon collisional activation and detected (MEAN-CaR-nMS). To establish reliability, a library of purified gangliosides incorporated into nanodiscs was screened against human immune lectins, and the results compared with affinities of the corresponding ganglioside oligosaccharides. Without a membrane anchor, nMS analysis yielded predominantly false negatives. In contrast, all ligands were identified by MEAN-(CaR)-nMS, with no false positives. To highlight the potential of MEAN-CaR-nMS for ligand discovery, a natural library of GSLs was incorporated into nanodiscs and screened against human and viral proteins to uncover elusive ligands. Finally, nMS-based detection of GSL ligands directly from cells is demonstrated. This breakthrough paves the way for shotgun glycomics screening using intact cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Favell et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: