Background: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in treating patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix (HGNEC). Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea, from January 1993 to December 2017, involving 60 patients with surgically treated HGNEC. Thirteen patients (21.7%) received NACT before undergoing surgery. Regarding the comparison between the group that underwent NACT and the group that did not, we used a propensity score-matched analysis, matching 22 patients in the primary radical surgery group with 11 patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy group. Results: In the entire cohort, primary open surgery was more common in the primary surgery group compared to the NACT group (p = 0.004). After propensity score matching (PSM), the median tumor size was 3.5 cm in the primary surgery group and 2.4 cm in the NACT group (p = 0.078). After matching, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (63.6% in the primary surgery group vs. 63.6% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, p = 0.782). After PSM, the primary surgery group exhibited a lower intraoperative transfusion rate (10%) than the NACT group (45.5%, p = 0.052). Conclusions: While NACT was feasible in patients with HGNEC, it did not significantly improve the survival rate over primary radical surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eum et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: