Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Several satellite gravity anomaly models are freely available to calculate the free‐air gravity anomaly in areas where shipborne gravity measurements are scarce. Two models produced by the Technical University of Denmark (DTU17) and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIOv32.1), respectively, were selected to compute the free‐air anomalies over the Cosmonaut Sea, East Antarctica. A statistical comparison analysis was performed to evaluate the resolution of satellite gravity anomaly models by comparing them with the shipborne surveying date. The radially averaged energy spectra of free‐air anomaly from different sources were calculated and compared over two selected regions to further evaluate the reliability of the data derived from satellite gravity anomaly models. The satellite gravity anomaly models have a better resolution in the ocean basin than in the area near the continental shelf. The comparison analysis revealed that the precision of both DTU17 and SIOv32.1 is close to the shipborne gravity data, but on average, SIOv32.1 is a little bit better than DTU17. The spectral analysis showed that the shipborne measurements may provide higher resolution than the satellite gravity anomaly model at wavelengths shorter than 20 km, and the free‐air data derived from SIOv32.1 have better resolution than the one from DTU17. These shipborne datasets will provide contributions for the updates of the Antarctic gravity anomaly and enable new high‐resolution combined Earth gravity models to be derived in Antarctica.
Yang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.