We formalize various counting principles and compare their strengths over V⁰ V 0 . In particular, we conjecture the following mutual independence between: a uniform version of modular counting principles and the pigeonhole principle for injections, a version of the oddtown theorem and modular counting principles of modulus p , where p is any natural number which is not a power of 2, and a version of Fisher’s inequality and modular counting principles. Then, we give sufficient conditions to prove them. We give a variation of the notion of PHP -tree and k -evaluation to show that any Frege proof of the pigeonhole principle for injections admitting the uniform counting principle as an axiom scheme cannot have o ( n )-evaluations. As for the remaining two, we utilize well-known notions of p -tree and k -evaluation and reduce the problems to the existence of certain families of polynomials witnessing violations of the corresponding combinatorial principles with low-degree Nullstellensatz proofs from the violation of the modular counting principle in concern.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eitetsu Ken (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: