PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 18, 2024Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology12 citations

Understanding customer multi-interactions, trust, social support and voluntary performance in smart restaurants

View Full Paper
HJHaoyue JiaoSun Yat-sen UniversityIWIpKin Anthony WongUniversity of MacauZLZhiwei LinSun Yat-sen University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to propose a triadic interaction model to assess the effect of customer–customer (C2C), employee–customer and robot–customer interactions on customer voluntary performance in the context of smart dining. Design/methodology/approach An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. First, a quantitative study surveyed Foodom patrons to assess the impact of triadic interactions on customer voluntary performance. The mediating role of trust and social support and the moderating effect of the need to belong were also explored. A post hoc study (Study 2) analyzed online comments to validate and complement the survey findings. Findings While all interactions promote social support, the C2C interactions significantly correlate with customer trust. Moreover, customer voluntary performance is influenced by both customer trust and social support, while the need to belong remains as a moderator. Findings from Study 2 consolidate and enrich the relationships identified in Study 1. Research limitations/implications This research reveals that patrons in smart dining still value interactions with employees and other diners. It enriches the stream of work on interaction quality by illuminating how different types of interactions could co-create value for customers, subsequently fostering voluntary behavior in smart dining contexts. Originality/value This research explores how patrons perceive interactions with robots in smart hospitality, highlighting their impact on trust and social support. It also sheds light on how interactions among robots, employees and customers influence customer voluntary performance, emphasizing the role of the need to belong in moderating relationships in this setting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiao et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5fda8b6db64358759101ehttps://doi.org/10.1108/jhtt-11-2023-0384
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Social Support and Psychological Well-Being: Theoretical Possibilities1985 · 474 citations
  2. 2Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control2021 · 1,638 citations
  3. 3INVESTIGATING TRUST IN E-COMMERCE: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND A MODEL FOR ITS FORMATION IN CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS2001 · 38 citations
  4. 4Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships1993 · 1,558 citations
  5. 5Culture and Social Support: Who Seeks It and Why?2004 · 945 citations