Background Classifying psychostimulant users as high and low responders based on median split of drug intake levels has face-validity: these appear to be different types of drug users. However, because psychostimulant intake levels a) are defined by an inverted U-shaped dose response (IUDR) curve, and b) do not necessarily imply motivation for the drug, it is unclear that median split-designated high and low drug responders represent different drug user types. Aims To determine if median split-designated groups of high and low drug takers represent distinct groups when subjected to a new cluster-based model. Methods Male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 11) self-administered cocaine doses (0.00, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 0.56 and 1.00 mg/kg/infusion) to reveal the IUDR curve per individual. We derived six variables defining the structure of the IUDR curve (amplitude, mean, width, and area under the curve: AUC) and the IUDR-derived economic demand curve (consumption at zero price or Q 0 and the motivation for drug or α). We compared median split and clustering of all variables (cocaine dose, IUDR/demand curves) obtained. Results Median split of individual cocaine doses and IUDR curve-derived variables identified high versus low responders, but these groups were inconsistent with regards to group composition. Clustering of all cocaine doses revealed one cluster. Clustering of IUDR curve-derived variables revealed one cluster. Global clustering of all cocaine doses and all IUDR curve-derived variables revealed only one cluster. Conclusions High and low drug takers do not necessarily represent distinct drug user types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castaneda et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: