Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract. In two case studies, airborne measurements of broadband solar irradiances above and below Arctic cirrus are compared to simulations of the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) operated by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) using offline runs of ECMWF's operational radiation scheme, “ecRad”. Furthermore, independent of the solar irradiances, cirrus properties are derived from collocated airborne active remote sensing observations to evaluate the optical and microphysical parameterizations in ecRad. The data were collected in the central Arctic over sea ice (81–90° N) with instrumentation installed aboard the High Altitude LOng range research aircraft (HALO) during a campaign in March and April 2022. Among others, the HALO instrumentation included upward- and downward-looking pyranometers to measure broadband solar irradiances, a cloud radar, and a multi-wavelength water vapour differential absorption lidar. Extended horizontal flight legs above and below single-layer cirrus were performed. The solar radiation measurements are used to evaluate ecRad in two case studies of optically thin and thick cirrus, with an average transmissivity of 0.9 and 0.6, respectively. Different ice optics parameterizations optionally available in ecRad are applied to test the match between simulation and measurements. Furthermore, the IFS-predicted ice water content and ice effective radius are replaced by values retrieved with the radar and lidar. The choice of ice optics parameterizations does not significantly improve the model–measurement agreement. However, introducing the retrieved ice microphysical properties brings measured and modelled irradiances in closer agreement for the optically thin cirrus, while the optically thick cirrus case is simulated as too thick. It is concluded that the ice water content simulated by the IFS is realistic and that the mismatch between observed and simulated solar irradiances mostly originates from the assumed or parameterized ice effective radius.
Röttenbacher et al. (Wed,) studied this question.