Introduction: Retinoblastoma treatment and follow-up is complex and varies between patients. Pathways of care can enhance the quality of care, patient outcomes, safety, satisfaction, and resource optimization. Developing a pathway of care for retinoblastoma was identified as a top research priority by the retinoblastoma community. This study aimed to co-design and pilot a pathway of care called the “Retinoblastoma Journey Map” tailored for caregivers of newly diagnosed children with retinoblastoma. Methods: A working group of patients, health professionals and researchers used human-centered design to ideate, prototype and refine the Retinoblastoma Journey Map. Caregivers of affected children were recruited to use and evaluate the Map. Mixed-methods data was collected on feasibility, acceptability, usability and perceived impact on communication, self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, and the quality of physician-patient interaction. Results: The Retinoblastoma Journey Map consisted of an illustrated roadmap with 25 child-friendly stickers covering clinical treatment, medical education and milestones. Quantitative analysis revealed that the Map was feasible, acceptable, and useable; however, no significant effect on communication, self-efficacy, anxiety, depression or quality of physician-patient interaction was observed. Qualitative analysis identified 6 themes: Primary Use; Challenges; Impact; Limitations; Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability; and Unmet Needs. Conclusion: A pathway of care for retinoblastoma, co-designed by researchers, health professionals, and patients, was useable, acceptable, and feasible by caregivers of children with retinoblastoma. While significant effects on communication and physician-patient interaction were not observed, “legacy building” – documentation of the pathway of care by families for later education of their child – emerged as an unanticipated yet important use of the Retinoblastoma Journey Map.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ristevski et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: